Of Lies And Deceit

Who oppose the current Vaad of Mosrim? (Jihad.info)

Let Yaakov Spritzer come to a Din Torah with all these claims and so called proves and make his case.

Why  is Spritzer withholding for over two years, showing up to a Din Torah?

Din Torah: Past, Present and Future

Psak Din[im] 5757/1997-5769/2008

Who Set The Trap For The Rav?

Who Forced The Rav To Appear In Court?

One Response to Of Lies And Deceit

  1. antimesira says:

    Reading spritzers appeal he seems to be doing the same thing chabad.info is doing in the post above. And that is, bring up the so called “violence” that never happened. Spritzer tried many times and in fact in trying right now, to use Judge Glassers Injunction/Restraining order in order to prove that there was in fact acts of violence.

    Spritzer and I believe the post on chabad.info is all Spritzers head fails to mention that the judge a little over a year, took the restraining order off.
    We all already know because it was documented right here on this site, what the judge said about all these claims of violence etc…after a 7 year trial.

    If you don’t remember, I will remind you.

    “On May 6, 1997, the plaintiffs, a not-for-profit Corporation and Yaakov Spritzer, filed a complaint against seven named defendants consisting of 167 paragraphs extending over 50 pages and asserting eleven claims as follows: I) RICO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1962(b); II) RICO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); III) RICO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c); IV) RICO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); V) Tortuous Interference with Contractual Relations; VI) Fraud; VII) Conversion; VIII) Unfair Competition; IX) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; X) Assault; XI) Intentional damages to property. To characterize the complaint as prolix, replete with hearsay and irrelevancies, would be charitable.”

    “The evidence established convincingly for this Court that what is alleged to be their abandonment was, instead, what I have analogized to be their constructive eviction by Spritzer.”

    For more, read the full verdict.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: