Spritzer Didn’t “Legally” Steal the Camp, He Just Pulled A מעשה שטן

Spritzer didn't "legally" steal the camp, so what do we want from him?

Spritzer didn't "legally" steal the camp, so what do we want from him?

The deed Spritzer displays as proof that the trustee sold him the camp, and therefore makes the case that any complaints should not fall on him but the trustee.

This attitude reminds us of the story with the שטן (Satan), who takes (g-d forbid) the soul of a Jew and therefore when people come to complain to him, he says don’t complain to me (don’t blame me) complain to the one who sent me.

The Gemara teaches (Baba Bathra pg.16) “Resh Lakish said: שוטן (Satan), יצר הרע (evil prompter), and the מלך המות (Angel of Death) are all one.

This [Satan] who comes down to earth and seduces (man to sin), then ascends to heaven and awakens wrath; permission is then granted to him and he takes away the soul. And he still has the Chutzpa to say I got permission from above to do it (take away the soul).

In our case (with the camp) Spritzer is very much like the Satan (above), except that Spritzer out smarts the Satan, he manages to do his dirty work with leis and does not need the (innocent) person to actually sin in order to mend punishment. In other words, he skips the part of causing somebody to sin, goes up to heaven concocts a bunch of leis and get his permission to mend out punishment.

Spritzer didn’t need any of his friends (the original directors) to sin; he immediately went to prosecute them in Federal Court with falsehood and blood libels. When Spritzer saw that the judge has caught on to his scheme and is going to make a verdict against him, Spritzer then runs to bankruptcy court, and in order to make claims, he ask of his friends and associates (local stores in our community and those he does business with) to fabricate bills of items that were already paid for or never bought to begin with. After Spritzer constructively puts the camp in bankruptcy he receives permission from the Court to buy the camp from the trustee.

Like the Satan (above) Spritzer makes the same claim “what do you want from me, I brought (and paid for) the camp from the trustee.

Spritzer is the Satan and Angle of death!

Yankle Spritzer is the Satan (hebrew)

7 Responses to Spritzer Didn’t “Legally” Steal the Camp, He Just Pulled A מעשה שטן

  1. noneedtoknow says:

    Actually, herskop requested that the camp REMAIN in bankruptcy court after glasser’s ruling that he is the director.
    So WHO it to blame for the camp being in bankruptcy court?! Why didn’t hershkop heed the trustee’s advice and MOVE the case back to glasser’s court?!

  2. Question to you (or other like you): when I answer this, whats going to change by you; what difference would it make; what difference can you make?

    Actually, herskop requested that the camp REMAIN in bankruptcy court after glasser’s ruling that he is the director.
    So WHO it to blame for the camp being in bankruptcy court?! Why didn’t hershkop heed the trustee’s advice and MOVE the case back to glasser’s court?!

    When you ask these questions you are assuming I know and all the readers know what you are talking about,
    I reserve the right to ask you to please explain with more details what you are asking,. When asking the question you must consider that I and other don’t know the back round (of your question). Besides I feel that you are making a bunch of false statements disguised in a question.

    example:

    Actually, herskop requested that the camp REMAIN in bankruptcy court after glasser’s ruling that he is the director.

    When did they request this; why did they request this (what did they want from Spritzer etc…); why did the judge want to get it out of his court, explain why they would be guilty of anything because they asked that it stay etc… etc…

    I am not going to invest time and energy writing long answers when you won’t invest in your question.

    In the end all this (conversation) is really irrelevant for RIGHT NOW a Din Torah has to take place about this whole case.
    Facts:
    Spritzer made all these complaints to the Bais Din already, they did not except his complaints and asked him to make these claims in front of them.
    Who says that Hershkop is 100% right, who says that they are 100% correct, perhaps the Halacha will side with Spritzers claims, so let Spritzer come to a Din Torah and get this over with.

  3. Camper says:

    “herskop requested that the camp REMAIN in bankruptcy court after glasser’s ruling”

    Ha ha! you make it sound like (as if) Yankle the Ganev and mossier Spritzer would have just walked away!

    History shows us how that worked out, every time he lost he went somewhere else!

    He didn’t get his win in Bais Din so he went to Federal court, he lost there so he went to bankruptcy, do you really think he was going to let it go?

  4. Chaim H. says:

    In a few words, they stayed in Bankruptcy
    a. Spritzer the satan would have gone else where, this would have never ended.

    b. to ask for the long awaited Chesbonos (accountings), that till today they haven’t received.

    c. to ask for all the money stolen from Machne Menachem.

    What happened? מעשה שטן happened.

    The lawyer representing the rightful owners, did not submit veracious motion to to the court, by the time that was discovered it was to late. The Judge said, had he seen these motions he would have made a different decision.
    The Judge suggested that they sue the lawyer. It is believed (from his actions) that he was working hand and hand with Spritzer the Satan.

    Like Machne Menachem wrote above, this is nothing more then a מעשה שטן. If Spritzer would not have gotten the camp in this court he would just move to a different one.

    Bottom line: Right now in the year 5769-2009 the original directors are asking for a Din Torah, there is no reason why Spritzer, especially when he has so many counter claims, not to want to face justice. Who knows maybe he is right. Until he comes to a Din Torah we will never really know.

  5. Justice for all! says:

    If Yankle takes Meir to court and Meir does everything in his power to defend himself and because of that many people were exposed and many mosdos loss out and Rabbonim have to show up in court etc…

    Whos responsible?

  6. MM says:

    The Talmud says, all that Satan does, he does for the sake of heaven. Without him, the defense attorney wouldn’t bother to dig up all the merits of the defense. And the defense would have to try so hard to give himself more merits.

    All those trying to make a case for the satan ,Ganev and mossier Yankle Spritzer, thank you very much, you are being a great help.

    Any issue not discused yet on the site, is not because I am (g-d forbid) trying to avoid (the truth), it’s just that I haven’t gotten to it yet.
    It’s here (all of it), so wait with patience, check out the site (no need to do that every day, spread the word (tell a friend).

  7. Upset says:

    He is a yid after all don’t you think calling him the Satan is a bit to far “af shechata yisroel hu”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: